Monday, April 29, 2013

1973 - Wherein I Make you Feel Very Uncomfortable

     Brace yourselves, this one may be a bit hard to stomach.  Today we're looking at one part of Francis Bacon's three-part series of "Black Triptychs."  This is Triptych, May-June 1973.


Triptych, May-June 1973, 1973
     Before we dive into this, I think some backstory is in order: In 1964, Francis Bacon's home was invaded by one George Dyer.  Dyer was a wastrel who spent most of his life stealing and getting arrested.  Bacon, a gay man, had a particular fondness for these types of men and they began a relationship.

     Eventually, Dyer began to become a prolific subject in Bacon's work.  These paintings initially were favorites of many critics, which gave Dyer more of a reason for being, and he gave up crime.  However, as the popularity of these paintings began to dwindle, Dyer became bitter and turned to alcohol.  Much of the rest of the relationship consisted of Bacon feeding Dyer's alcoholism.  This led to them eventually splitting up.

     Jump forward to October 1971, when Bacon asks Dyer to accompany him to Paris for a retrospective of his work at the Grand Palais, at a time when Bacon was being called Britain's "greatest living painter."  Dyer, feeling very out of place in this world, made many attempts at commanding Bacon's attention, until finally, on the eve of the retrospective, he overdosed on barbiturates and died.

     Bacon's grief at his former lover's death came out of him in the form of the Black Triptychs, which depicted Dyer at various points before, during, and after his death.

     The most striking feature of this triptych is how immediate the emotional impact is.  Even without all the backstory mentioned above, Bacon's style and formal choices very clearly express the emotions at play here.

     The first formal item of note is the angle of each frame.  It is a completely flat, wide angle.  There is no glamor or beauty lavished on this disturbing display.  The lighting has been spared similar gestures of grandeur; the lighting of the subject is very flat, much in keeping with what one might see in someone's home.  The panels take a very voyeuristic approach to their presentation, forcing the viewer to sit, perhaps across the room, and watch this man crumble.

     Bacon's expressionist style lends itself very effectively to depicting Dyer's twisted figure and matching mental state.  What comes across in the painting is pure, raw emotion, taking the viewer inside the state of mind of this man, of whom Bacon had extensive, intimate knowledge.

     One final element of note is the question of which direction this triptych is meant to be read.  For my money, I would say right to left.  Because of the way we learn to read (left-to right), we tend to follow images in much the same way.  In film, for example, an effective way to elicit gasps from an audience is to have a character move from right to left across the frame.  It disturbs our natural tendencies and pulls us out of our comfort zones.  Since I felt this painting was doing that anyway, my interpretation is that it follows a right-to-left chronology.  Aside from that it seems to make the most sense: Dyer is in a heap, vomiting into a sink (far right); he achieves a brief respite, wherein he sits and contemplates his situation, perhaps beginning to regret some of his choices, manifesting itself as the bat-like shadow cast upon the floor (center); finally, he moves himself to the toilet, crumpled like a piece of paper, however, having expelled some of his demons, he has taken on a slightly warmer hue (far left).

My Opinion
     I find this piece simultaneously striking and deeply unsettling.  The sheer range of emotions on display here cannot but affect me on a very deep level.  Having known people with suicidal tendencies adds an extra dimension to this triptych for me; through Bacon's portrayal, I'm able to see in Dyer what I saw the beginnings of in them.  For me that's the most effective part of the work; just how perfectly Bacon has managed to render this man in his most fragile state.  Stunning, affecting, and deeply disturbing.  This is my personal favorite of the Black triptychs, but the others are definitely worth checking out.

That's all for today, hope you enjoyed!

1972 - Spooky Edition

     Today, I'll be looking at a piece of art with a bit of a sinister history.  I'm a fan of horror and especially urban legends, so this is right up my alley.  Today's work is The Hands Resist Him by Bill Stoneham.
The Hands Resist Him - 1973
     Yeah.  Creepy, right?  There's a lot to say about this image, so let's dive right in.

     This is one of the few works thus far that I've been able to find a concrete artist's interpretation, so I'll provide that for reference and expound upon it.

     First, we look at the boy.  According to the artist, the image of the boy was based on a photo of him from when he was five.  This adds another dimension of realism and personality to the painting.  Given how much the boy stands out from the rest of the painting color-wise, making him look as real and human as possible adds to the overall impact of the painting.

     Stoneham states that the door behind the boy represents the divide between the waking world and the world of fantasy and impossibilities.  What is interesting about that interpretation is the way Stoneham has chosen to represent it in the painting.  All that can be seen beyond the door is a crowd of hands pressing against the glass of the door (these have their own separate symbolic value that I'll get to later).  Since we, the viewers are seeing into this realm from our reality, where the things beyond this door remain impossible, all we are shown is infinite blackness.  Our world has no context for the wonders and/or horrors that lie beyond the door, thus, it stands to reason that from our perspective we would see nothing.

     It is only with an escort that we in the world of things possible and concrete may venture through the door.

     Enter the doll-girl.  According to Stoneham, she serves as an escort to take the boy past the barrier of the door into the world of the impossible.  Along with the very clearly sculpted joints on her arms, legs, and mouth, the design of the character seems very intentionally meant to emphasize the contrast between the two worlds.  While the boy's face is full of life and character, as discussed above, the doll's face is, well, that of a doll: very little is expressed through the facial configuration, and in particular the eyes, which have been rendered as lifeless black beads.  Even something as simple as a color scheme is used toward this end.  The boy's clothes are much brighter shades of teal and green, while the girl's look dirty and worn.

     The hands, Stoneham says, are meant to represent alternate lives or possibilities.  This is especially effective given the nature of the door and the darkness behind it.  It would be imposible for someone to know what their other selves would look like, which is why the rest of the figures fall of into the darkness, but a hand is very easily identifiable, and our real-world frame of reference is informed enough for us to be able to identify it.

     And now for a fun fact: you'll recall I mentioned urban legends above. In February 2000, this painting was put up for auction on eBay by a couple in California.  This couple believed the painting to be haunted, claiming to have caught it moving on camera.  What they thought they saw was the doll-girl aiming a gun at the boy, which in reality was just the battery that the girl is holding and the segment of window pane behind it.  Below is the item description as seen in the original listing, along with all relevant pictures:
"WHEN WE RECEIVED THIS PAINTING, WE THOUGHT IT WAS REALLY GOOD ART. A " PICKER " HAD FOUND IT ABANDONED BEHIND AN OLD BREWERY. AT THE TIME WE WONDERED A LITTLE WHY A SEEMINGLY PERFECTLY FINE PAINTING WOULD BE DISCARDED LIKE THAT. ( TODAY WE DON'T !!! ) ONE MORNING OUR 4 AND 1/2 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER CLAIMED, THAT THE CHILDREN IN THE PICTURE WERE FIGHTING, AND COMING INTO THE ROOM DURING THE NIGHT. NOW, I DON'T BELIEVE IN UFOS OR ELVIS BEING ALIVE, BUT MY HUSBAND WAS ALARMED. TO MY AMUSEMENT HE SET UP A MOTION TRIGGERED CAMERA FOR THE NIGHTS. AFTER THREE NIGHTS THERE WERE PICTURES.THE LAST TWO PICTURES SHOWN ARE FROM THAT 'STAKEOUT'. AFTER SEEING THE BOY SEEMINGLY EXITING THE PAINTING UNDER THREAT, WE DECIDED, THE PAINTING HAS TO GO.PLEASE JUDGE FOR YOURSELF. --- BEFORE YOU DO, PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING WARNING AND DISCLAIMER. ----WARNING: DO NOT BID ON THIS PAINTING IF YOU ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO STRESS RELATED DISEASE, FAINT OF HEART OR ARE UNFAMILIAR WITH SUPERNATURAL EVENTS. BY BIDDING ON THIS PAINTING, YOU AGREE TO RELEASE THE OWNERS OF ALL LIABILITY IN RELATION TO THE SALE OR ANY EVENTS HAPPENING AFTER THE SALE, THAT MIGHT BE CONTRIBUTED TO THIS PAINTING. THIS PAINTING MAY OR MAY NOT POSESS SUPERNATURAL POWERS, THAT COULD IMPACT OR CHANGE YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER, BY BIDDING YOU AGREE TO EXCLUSIVELY BID ON THE VALUE OF THE ARTWORK, WITH DISREGARD TO THE LAST TWO PHOTOS FEATURED IN THIS AUCTION, AND HOLD THE OWNERS HARMLESS IN REGARD TO THEM AND THEIR IMPACT, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.------------ NOW THAT WE GOT THIS OUT OF THE WAY, ONE QUESTION TO YOU EBAYERS. WE WANT OUR HOUSE TO BE BLESSED AFTER THE PAINTING IS GONE, DOES ANYBODY KNOW, WHO IS QUALIFIED TO DO THAT? THE SIZE OF THE PAINTING IS 24 BY 36 INCHES, SO IT IS RATHER LARGE. AS I HAVE HAD SEVERAL QUESTIONS, HERE THE FOLLOWING ANSWERS. THERE WAS NO ODOR LEFT BEHIND IN THE ROOM. THERE WERE NO VOICES, OR THE SMELL OF GUNPOWDER, NO FOODPRINTS OR STRANGE FLUIDS ON THE WALL. TO DETER QUESTIONS IN THIS DIRECTION, THERE ARE NO GHOSTS IN THIS WORLD , NO SUPERNATURAL POWERS, THIS IS JUST A PAINTING, AND MOST THESE THINGS HAVE AN EXPLANATION, IN THIS CASE PROBABLY A FLUKE LIGHT EFFECT. I ENCOURAGE YOU TO BID ON THE ARTWORK, AND CONSIDER THE LAST TWO PHOTOGRAPHS AS PURE ENTERTAINMENT, AND PLEASE DO NOT TAKE THEM INTO CONSIDERATION, WHEN BIDDING. AS WE THINK IT IS A GOOD IDEA TO BLESS ANY HOUSE, WE STILL WELCOME INPUT INTO THAT PROCEDURE. 
This auction is nearing the end. I want to thank the more than 13000 people that took the time to look at this image on Ebay. I appreciate the more than 30 suggestions, that I received regarding blessing the house, exorcising and cleansing. 7 e-mails reported strange or irregular events taking place, when viewing this image. And I will relay two suggestions made by the senders. First not to use this image as the background on the screen, and second not to display this image around juveniles or children. Last not least, thanks for appreciating the art as well."



My Opinion

     I really enjoy this piece.  There's a certain haunting starkness to its presentation, and the contrast between the boy and the girl works really well.  While I don't personally feel the artist's statements on the piece totally line up with the tone of the piece, I can still understand them, and still find the piece incredibly evocative.  Aside from all of that, the painting comes with a really interesting legend surrounding it that, if nothing else, certainly makes for an afternoon of interesting research.

Well that's all from my end!  Hope you've enjoyed this creepier-than-usual entry!  See you next time!
"And remember kids: ghosts are just wisps of your regrets, sent to remind you of what can never be..." - Anonymous
EDIT:  I'm not sure what that last part is. I didn't type it and Blogger won't let me delete it.